Shawalphabet YahooGroup Archive Browser
From: "tithhmi" <klkls@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 06:21:30 #
Subject: primer
Toggle Shavian
I have been thinking trying to write a shavian primer to facilitate
learning of the orthography. I hope to allow for slaves to the TO
(like myself) to become fluent readers and writers of Shavian. The
only problem right now is that I have no ide what I'm doing. Do any
(spelling) standards in exist, or is it pretty much 'sound-spell'? Is
a 'sound-spell' system acceptable?
What is the need of the group in practice/learning texts? The need
outside of the group?
Is there any decided method of promoting shavian outside of the
context of this group?
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 06:54:42 #
Subject: Re: [shawalphabet] primer
Toggle Shavian
On 8/10/05, tithhmi <klkls@...> wrote:
> I have been thinking trying to write a shavian primer to facilitate
> learning of the orthography. I hope to allow for slaves to the TO
> (like myself) to become fluent readers and writers of Shavian. The
> only problem right now is that I have no ide what I'm doing. Do any
> (spelling) standards in exist, or is it pretty much 'sound-spell'? Is
> a 'sound-spell' system acceptable?
There's occasionally some discussion on this, I think.
Some people advocate using the spelling in _Androcles and the Lion_,
which is roughly British English but rhotic (so "law" and "lore" are
written differently). It does differentiate between "cot" and
"caught", and between "bother" and "father", and between "pen" and
"pin", and between "Mary", "marry", and "merry", for example.
Others say, write the way you pronounce it, so if you merge "pen" and
"pin", use one letter for both vowel sounds.
I'm biassed because my native 'lect is pretty much "generic British"
so I have little difficulty in spelling things the Androcles way even
without looking things up, just by bellyfeel, but I'd say that
something intended for a general audience (rather than, say,
specifically a US one) should probably be written with a maximum
number of distinctions.
Though this will undoubtedly mean, for many writers, looking up words
in a dictionary that makes those distinctions if their own 'lect
doesn't make them, to see whether e.g. "grass" is written with "ash"
or with "ah". (I'd say "grahss" and "mahster", but "crass" and
"passta".)
One resource that's occasionally pointed to is AHD4 (The American
Heritage(r) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition), which
you can find at http://dictionary.reference.com/ (among other places);
it makes more distinctions than General American (e.g. cot-caught, but
not horse-hoarse or for-four, which Shavian also does not
distinguish). Although it seems to use "ash" for
pass/faster/master/grass/ask/answer, which surprises me.
I'm having difficulty finding good examples in _Androcles_, but I have
found an occurrence of "answer" which uses "ah", not "ash", so I'd
guess uses that vowel sound also e.g. in pass/master/ask. And also
"danced" with "ah". And also "laughing". Hm, so AHD4 is not perfect at
approximating _Androcles_ Shavian usage, though it does list both
"laff" and "lahf" pronunciations for "laugh".
> What is the need of the group in practice/learning texts?
I think reading practice is always good.
We had a system where people would take turns transcribing texts of
their choice and posting them (or links to them) to the group but it
kind of died out.
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
From: "tithhmi" <klkls@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 07:23:07 #
Subject: Re: Typography for the computer screen
Toggle Shavian
In Hebrew and other languages having an abjad, the acronyms are
actually pronounced by sounding the words (TaNaKH). SOmething
similiar might work for Shavian. We could use a fairly standard way
of determining what vowels go best between consonants or what
consonants between vowels. I actually like the Hebrew tendency of
using 'a' (<i>on</i>). <i>ago</i> might make a good choice for a
vowel and/or consonant: English, as most Germanics, is fond of the
sound, which <em>can</em> act as a vowel, but is actually a consonant.
I've used it in my Droiderik language for almost everything as a
mediating consonant <em>and</em> vowel, but more of that later (like
when the transcription doesn't look like the alphabet blew up in your
face...) anything ending in 'r' would obviously use either 'err' or
'array'. (T.L.R.=> talD/tolX/tAlX) in pronunciation. Obviously, it
would be helpful to write it out as a regular abbreviation (maybe).
--- In shawalphabet@yahoogroups.com, "paul vandenbrink"
<pvandenbrink11@h...> wrote:
> Hi John
>
> You raise an number of important issues, that we touched on a while
> back when talked about employing some of the obsolete accent and
> punctuation keys.
> Since the Shavian Alphabet requires a new Keyboard Mapping it
> behooves us to make sure that we have all the Punctuation signs and
> other accoutrements of Clear/Clean writing at our fingertips.
>
> First remember Capitalization is gone. and indentation is up in the
> air. Also there are all those other writing conventions,
> (Abbreviations, Contractions, Acronyms, Omonophia, etc) which have
> been developed using the Roman letters. How will they work with the
> Shavian Phonetic Alphabet?
> I think a subset of them will work well. But we have to spell out
> what works, what doesn't and what has to be changed.
> First, Acronyms. The Shavian Letter names cannot be used for Acronyms.
> Most of them are words, with there own meanings. They can can be
> written but how the heck would you pronounce them aloud. We need a
> set of Shavian Letter names that can be used for writing Acronyms.
> Roman based Acronyms will just have to be written phonetically.
>
> While I think many of your concerns require a full discussion,
> let me just hit the high points to start things going.
>
> 1. I like Double quotes. They will have to be higher for the Tall
> letters.
> 2. Since we don't have Capitalization and indentation is tricky.
> Why don't we start all paragraphs and wherever convenient new
> sentences at the beginning of a line.
> We can put a half blank line between Paragraphs. I like using bold
> and italic fonts.
> Remember lines are wider and narrower with Shavian text.
> Perhaps, concatenated words of all kinds can be seperated with an
> apostrophe or hyphen.
> I will continue my response at a later time.
>
> Regards, Paul V.
> __________________attached___________________________
>
> --- In shawalphabet@yahoogroups.com, John Burrows <burrows@t...>
> wrote:
> > I've been following recent e-mails with interest, but am currently
> more
> > concerned with the appearance of the Shaw alphabet.
>
> I have re-worked some of Androcles, whch is the only
> > model available. That is a play, complete with stage directions,
> and uses
> > are found for italics and bold texts, for which there are separate
> font
> > faces, as well as for plain and square brackets. When I turned to
> Jane
> > Austen, hoping for a plain text stream, rather like listening to a
> book
> > being read aloud, I found there were other problems.
> I want the output to
> > look nice, but if it is too smooth and regular it will be difficult
> to
> > read.
>
> More specifically, which effects are needed and which choices must I
> > make from those below :--
> > Emphatic punctuation with curved commas and apostrophes or straight
> lines
> > and single quotes
> > Emphasis through bold, italics, underlining or continental style
> l i k e t h i s, or Turkish like (this).
> > What about abbreviations? (Mr. Bingley, Mr Bingley, mr Bingley,
> mister
> > Bingley, M:R, m-r)
> > Portait or landscape?
> What is the ideal line length for Shavian?
> > The __shire militia. They lived at Wh_rt_n.
> looong vowels. lloudd sounds.
> > Concatenation of words, at least in speech : He maybe coming at
> fiveoclock
> > tomorrowafternoon.
> > jb
From: "tithhmi" <klkls@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 07:25:22 #
Subject: alphabetic order
Toggle Shavian
is there any kind of order to the Shavian alphabet? Is there any
possibility of making one?
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 08:49:36 #
Subject: Re: [shawalphabet] alphabetic order
Toggle Shavian
On 8/10/05, tithhmi <klkls@...> wrote:
> is there any kind of order to the Shavian alphabet?
I use the order found on the reading key that accompanies _Androcles
and the Lion_ (peep, tot, kick, ....).
This is also the order used in the Unicode Shavian block (
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U10450.pdf ). I think it's as good
as any order.
A case could also be made for going "peep, bib, tot, dead, kick, gag,
..., loll, roar, mime, nun, if, eat, egg, age, ..., out, oil, ah, awe,
air, err, array, ear, Ian, yew", keeping voiced and unvoiced
consonants at the same place of articulation as well as "long" and
"short" vowels together.
> Is there any possibility of making one?
Obviously.
I suppose your question is more, is there a possibility of making _a
standardised_ alphabetical order, since a personal order is only
slightly useful.
Personally, I'd say go with "peep, tot, kick".
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
From: Star Raven <celestraof12worlds@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 12:54:08 #
Subject: Re: [shawalphabet] primer
Toggle Shavian
I think that a clear rhotic British and a clear, rhotic American can be
combined to create a spelling standard, as it were, for technical
documents and novelists (like myself) to have a standard. After that,
the sound spell for just daily notes would be fine. As in "the word is
pronounced thus by a clear rhotic British/American accent however,
writing it another way is also appropriate." Just because "wanted" is
spelled out as it is, doesn't mean that the sign down the road from
where my father lives isn't correct. "Dirt Wonted" He's just reflecting
his pronunciation.
As for the primer, I was thinking that repeated sounds (check the book
"why johnny can't read" in the back there is a great word list) used in
books like Dr. Seuss or just made up (laugh at the fat cat) in
increasing complexity just as we teach children to read, write, and
type, would be the only way to go, right? Is there a better way?
--Star
=========
http://www.livejournal.com/users/wodentoad
Just because you're evil on the inside, doesn't mean you can't look pretty on the outside.
--Mother Mae-Eye
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From: "Ph.D." <phil@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 15:21:26 #
Subject: Re: [shawalphabet] primer
Toggle Shavian
Philip Newton skribis:
>
> One resource that's occasionally pointed to is AHD4 (The American
> Heritage(r) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition), which
> you can find at http://dictionary.reference.com/ (among other places);
> it makes more distinctions than General American (e.g. cot-caught, but
> not horse-hoarse or for-four, which Shavian also does not
> distinguish). Although it seems to use "ash" for
> pass/faster/master/grass/ask/answer, which surprises me.
Why does this surprise you? General American does make a distinction
between cot/caught but not between horse/hoarse or for/four. General
American does have the sound of "ash" in pass/faster/master/grass/ask
/answer.
--Ph. D.
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 15:44:31 #
Subject: Re: [shawalphabet] primer
Toggle Shavian
On 8/10/05, Ph.D. <phil@...> wrote:
> Philip Newton skribis:
> >
> > One resource that's occasionally pointed to is AHD4 (The American
> > Heritage(r) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition), which
> > you can find at http://dictionary.reference.com/ (among other places);
> > it makes more distinctions than General American (e.g. cot-caught, but
> > not horse-hoarse or for-four, which Shavian also does not
> > distinguish). Although it seems to use "ash" for
> > pass/faster/master/grass/ask/answer, which surprises me.
>
> Why does this surprise you? General American does make a distinction
> between cot/caught but not between horse/hoarse or for/four.
I was under the impression that the 'lect underlying AHD4 was not GA
but something a bit closer to British pronunciation -- specifically,
something moderately suitable for Androcles-style Shavian.
(And I didn't know that GA does not have the cot/caught merger.)
It appears that AHD4 is not *that* great an approximation at Androcles
Shavian, but it may still be better than the native 'lect for some
people.
> General American does have the sound of "ash" in
> pass/faster/master/grass/ask/answer.
I see.
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
From: "horndinkle3" <disposable3@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 15:56:37 #
Subject: Re: Shavian Fonts for the Gallery of Unicode Fonts
Toggle Shavian
--- In shawalphabet@yahoogroups.com, "tithhmi" <klkls@G...> wrote:
> if you can teach me how to make a font, I wouldn't mind trying mine
> hand thereat.
I don't actually know how to make fonts...
-David
From: "paul vandenbrink" <pvandenbrink11@...>
Date: 2005-08-10 22:54:17 #
Subject: Re: primer
Toggle Shavian
Hi Philip
I'd like to make a Primer too.
But I was concerned that the order and the Names of the Shaw
Alphabet might be an unnecessary hurdle for someone familar with the
order of the Roman Alphabet.
I find the fact that the Greek and Hebrew Alphabets are close to the
Roman Alphabet in order, to helpful in looking up a word in those
languages.
A while back I suggested an Alternate Shavian Alphabet order with
more distinctive names. Maybe we could use that as a starting point.
I think it is also a good idea that the more commonly used letters
should be at the beginning of the Alphabet.
Here is the new proposed order.
1. Adoo (ado)
2. Alef (ash)
3. Aitch (Ice)
4. Bet (Bib)
5. Gimel (Gag)
6. Delta (Dead)
7. Hey (Ha-ha)
8. Vav (Vow)
9. Zaiyeen (zoo)
10. Tawf (tot) pronounced like Toff-ee
11. Yad (Yea)
12. Yood (Yew)
13. Kawf (kick) pronounced like cough
14. Lamed (loll)
15. Mem (mime)
16. Nash (nun)
17. Ingga (hung)
18. Sam (so)
19. Ester (egg)
20. Eisawv (age) pronounced like A-salve
21. Eiran (air) pronounced like Air-an
22. Pey (peep) pronounced like pay
23. Earl (Array)
24. Urd (Urge)
25. Resh (Roar)
26. Shawn (Sure)
27. Fee (fee)
28. Wazoo (woe)
29. Jawn (measure) pronounced like the the French "Jean"
30. Cheetch (church)
31. Judge (judge)
32. Thor (thigh)
33. Thawn (They)
34. Izrah (If)
35. Eesy (Eat) pronounced like E.C.
36. Oprah (Oak)
37. Oivy (Oil)
38. Ooze (ooze)
I haven't figured out a good order for the remaining 10
Vowel sounds. They are harder to fit into the traditional pattern.
up, on, ah, wool, out, awe
Ir, Are, Or
and Ian
Suggestions?
Regards, Paul V.
_______________attached________________________________________
--- In shawalphabet@yahoogroups.com, Philip Newton
<philip.newton@g...> wrote:
> On 8/10/05, Ph.D. <phil@p...> wrote:
> > Philip Newton skribis:
> > >
> > > One resource that's occasionally pointed to is AHD4 (The
American
> > > Heritage(r) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
Edition), which
> > > you can find at http://dictionary.reference.com/ (among other
places);
> > > it makes more distinctions than General American (e.g. cot-
caught, but
> > > not horse-hoarse or for-four, which Shavian also does not
> > > distinguish). Although it seems to use "ash" for
> > > pass/faster/master/grass/ask/answer, which surprises me.
> >
> > Why does this surprise you? General American does make a
distinction
> > between cot/caught but not between horse/hoarse or for/four.
>
> I was under the impression that the 'lect underlying AHD4 was not
GA
> but something a bit closer to British pronunciation --
specifically,
> something moderately suitable for Androcles-style Shavian.
>
> (And I didn't know that GA does not have the cot/caught merger.)
>
> It appears that AHD4 is not *that* great an approximation at
Androcles
> Shavian, but it may still be better than the native 'lect for some
> people.
>
> > General American does have the sound of "ash" in
> > pass/faster/master/grass/ask/answer.
>
> I see.
> --
> Philip Newton <philip.newton@g...>